Sunday, 19 January 2025

"I wonder as I wander" - a sermon for the Second Sunday after Epiphany

In 1933 an  American, John Jacob Niles, was at an outdoor meeting in the town of Murphy in the  Appalachian Mountains in North Carolina. At that meeting a girl stepped out to the edge of the little platform attached to a car and began to sing. 


Niles, writing many years later, said, ‘her clothes were unbelievable dirty and ragged, and she, too, was unwashed. Her ash-blond hair hung down in long skeins.... But, best of all... in her untutored way, she could sing. She smiled as she sang, smiled rather sadly, and sang this line.

I wonder as I wander out under the sky,
How Jesus the Savior did come for to die.
For poor ordinary people like you and like I...
I wonder as I wander out under the sky."

There is nothing about this Carol which places it especially in this Epiphany season. In a later verse, we have the Wiseman, but they appear with the Shepherds. There is, I guess, a focus on the star that led the wise men, rather than the Angelic chorus of the Shepherd’s. But on first hearing it seems like many of the beautiful carols we have heard sung through these last weeks. But this always feels like an Epiphany Carol to me.

Unlike many of the Carols of Christmas it has neither the bombast of Hark the Herald Angels, nor the sentiment of Away in a Manger. Rather it is reflective. It suits these weeks when we stay and ponder more deeply the Christmas story after the rest of the world has packed Christmas away and got back to normal life again. This reflective tone is complimented by the plaintive tune which, with the words, ensures that our reflections keep an eye on the whole of the story. Lifting our gaze from the stable door to the life and passion of Jesus our saviour who “did come for to die”. And these reflective themes come together in that deep virtue of this Epiphany season, one repeated through this carol, the virtue of wonder.

Epiphany is a season of Wonder. 


We hear it again and again as we sing of the “star of wonder, star of night” that frames this season. We hear of it again in one of the traditional themes of this season, that of “The Three Wonders”. This theme comes from an antiphon, a short anthem, sung either side of the Magnificat on the Feast of the Epiphany, which is then echoed in the opening section of our Eucharistic Prayer:

Three wonders mark this day we celebrate: today the star led the Magi to the manger; today water was changed into wine at the marriage feast; today Christ desired to be baptized by John in the river Jordan to bring us salvation, alleluia.

Over the last three weeks we have been marking these three wonders, reflecting on these three stories in turn – the visit of the Magi, the Baptism of Christ, and the Wedding at Cana – three great stories which mark what the early Church called in Greek the Epiphanous, what we would translate as the manifestation of Christ to the world. Wonders indeed.

But there is a danger with these wonders that we simply observe them, study them, look at them from afar. So, for instance, on this Sunday, we might look in turn at the story of the wedding feast at Cana and pull apart its constituent parts trying to find the meaning. We might muse that it happened on “on the third day”. We would reflect on the imagery of the six water jars and the abundance of wine and calculate its volume and ascertain some meaning in the spirit of numerology. We can examine and survey the story so much that we discover that from considering this wonder, this story has lost its wonder.

To reflect deeply on these wonders, we need to return to our Carol and remind ourselves on what it is to wonder. The Three Wonders of Epiphany are wonders as a noun. These are events which meet the dictionary definition of a wonder, as a thing unexpected, unfamiliar, or inexplicable. But Epiphany is also a time for us to spend time with wonder as a verb. 

This is what we find in our Carol. Here we glimpse what it means to be surprised again by this great story, and through this wonder desire to know more about God’s love for us all. That as we wonder as we wander we glimpse afresh the extraordinary truth of what God came to do for “poor ordinary people like you and like I.” In our lives of certainty and right and wrong wondering is not something we naturally do. It does not create clarity and it certainty does not encourage productive activity. But wondering is such an important part of faith.

Godly Play is the name of a form of creative Bible Story telling that I know some of you will be very well versed in. Often used with children, but equally effective with all ages, it uses beautiful objects to creatively tell Bible stories. It encourages those listening to the stories to learn about them not through their personal experience and response to the story that they have heard. These responses are encouraged, but not coerced, through a series of questions framed: I wonder…

I wonder what you like best about this story…I wonder which is the most important part…I wonder where you are in this story?

Through this a skilled Godly Play storyteller can help those who hear the story cut past those things we think we are supposed to do when we are learning; like gaining knowledge or learning the right answers. Rather they help foster a personal response and spiritual engagement with God’s word and God’s presence in our lives. In this Epiphany season, as we reflect on these great wonders, we need to remember again what it is to wonder.


We need to wonder, as those travelling wise men did, on the path that God’s quiet but insistent voice is calling us to follow. We need to wonder in the manifestation of this call in the waters of baptism and hear the voice from heaven that calls us all as the beloved in who the Father is well pleased. We need to wonder on the super-abundance of God’s love in Jesus. In a love which is not just enough, nor a bit generous, but ridiculously and laughably generous as at a wedding feast overflowing with the finest wine.

Epiphany is a time of wonder: of manifestations and miracles, of proclamations and Godly power, and for us to find this we must wonder. We must wonder again about the deep and transforming truth God shows us in the birth of his son Jesus Christ, and wonder again on that deep truth that 

…Jesus the Saviour did come for to die.
For poor ordinary people like you and like I...

Sunday, 24 November 2024

"Love Him in the World of the Flesh": a sermon for the Feast of Christ the King

I sit in one of the dives
On Fifty-second Street
Uncertain and afraid
As the clever hopes expire
Of a low dishonest decade:

Those words begin WH Auden’s great poem “September 1, 1939”. Written in America by the exiled Auden they are a direct response to the news of the invasion of Poland by the German army on that date. An act which, as we all know, precipitated the beginning of the Second World War in Europe.


For a poem which is so rooted in its very specific time and place, it has had an extraordinary afterlife. Many young Americans reached for it in the weeks after the attacks of September 11th. Finding in it a sense of shock and loss at the sudden crumbling of a seemingly naive and comfortable consensus. One could imagine similarly idealistic young Americans looking to it again in the last few weeks as the re-election of Donald Trump means that his political life was not, as they hoped, a seeming aberration but a setting of a new, and for some, strange political landscape.

The poem also carries in it a reflection of human experience as our expectations of our world and life suddenly change. Returning to the original context of the poem Auden sees the fault of Europe's moral and political crisis in careless enlightenment ideals of his time. 

The enlightenment driven away,
The habit-forming pain,
Mismanagement and grief:
We must suffer them all again.

As things he thought he knew were coming dramatically to an end one can recognise in Auden’s words both an anger and resignation to the lot and life that lay ahead of him in these newly uncertain times.

The book of Daniel, which we heard read in our first reading today, could be seen to pre-echo some of the sense of human dislocation and uncertainty that colours Auden’s poem. On first look the book of Daniel tells of the prophetic ministry of Daniel, exiled to the court of Babylon, who through his ability to interpret dreams comes to be one of the leading players in the court of Kings Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar. 

For a short book it includes some of the most well-known biblical images which have found their way into our common language. It is, of course, Daniel who is thrown into the Lion’s den. It is also where King Belshazzar great feast is cut short by the sight of a disembodied hand and the “writing on the wall” and where he is weighed in the balance and found wanting.


We can find in the vivid stories of Daniel the same human experience of uncertainty and dislocation that we find in Auden’s poem. Although set during the time of the Babylonian exile in the sixth and fifth centuries BC, the text we have now was formed and brought together later, possibly in the second century before Christ where the experience of the people of Israel was dominated by the conquests of Alexander the Great the later Maccabean revolt and the looming threat of the Roman Empire.

Like Auden, like Daniel, we live in uncertain and unsettling times. Just in the last few months there have been momentous elections in America. We are coming to terms in our own world with large and significant decisions made by our new government which will affect many people’s live and homes – not least in the farming community. Within the life of the church the repeated failures in safeguarding have made many question what the true future of the church in our national life could and should be. This list could go on and on.

In the face of this we could all be tempted to be like Auden in his poem and reject those old certainties which he tags as the impossible hope of “universal love”. Instead, Auden says we must look to the small things we can hold onto – almost literally – in family and loved ones. As he says towards the end of his poem:

For the error bred in the bone
Of each woman and each man
Craves what it cannot have,
Not universal love
But to be loved alone.

Despite the deep popularity of this poem its focus on a limited hope troubled Auden as his life went on. Over the years he tried to edit and change this poem which, as one critic has said, offers “simple answers to difficult questions, which is not necessarily a good thing.”

And with that insight we might return to the book of Daniel. Faced with a world of uncertainty and dislocation Daniel’s response is not to turn in on a simple more limited hope. Instead, the hope he looks for draws from the largest and possible canvas. The reading we heard today comes from the second part of the book where, faced with the experience of dislocation and uncertainty, Daniel sees in dreams and visions the great apocalyptic landscape of God’s promise and hope for creation.

As I watched,
thrones were set in place,
   and an Ancient One took his throne;
his clothing was white as snow,
   and the hair of his head like pure wool;
his throne was fiery flames,
   and its wheels were burning fire.
A stream of fire issued
   and flowed out from his presence.
A thousand thousand served him,
   and ten thousand times ten thousand stood attending him.

On this Feast of Christ the King, standing as we do at the end of the great cycle of prayer and praise we have followed through this year, we are called to lift our eyes from the troubles and dislocations of our present time and place them in God’s time.

As we look to that promise and hope we find it coming to us again in the journey of Advent that we will begin next week. That deep promise that through all the changes and chances of this fleeting world the God of Daniel, the Ancient of Days, will come to be with us in a baby born amongst us and a man who will walk with us.

Moving away from this one poem this was, in truth, a reality that Auden himself knew. In 1941, possibly in the darkest days of the Second World War, Auden began work on his long poem For The Time Being which had the subtitle A Christmas Oratorio. In that great work Auden finds a hope which he could not see in 1939. It is a great hope that we begin again to look to. It is that great hope and promise of the incarnation.

As his oratorio ends, we hear him lift his eyes from the present and place his hope again the promise of that universal love. That promise which we should set our hearts to again at this turning of the year.

He is the Way. 
Follow Him through the Land of Unlikeness; 
You will see rare beasts, and have unique adventures. 
 
He is the Truth. 
Seek Him in the Kingdom of Anxiety; 
You will come to a great city that has expected your return for years. 
 
He is the Life. 
Love Him in the World of the Flesh; 
And at your marriage all its occasions shall dance for joy.

Amen




Sunday, 3 November 2024

Chronos and Kairos: a sermon for All Saints'

Time and tide, they say, waits for no one. 

I have come to a time in my life where time, all of a sudden, seems to be a real and palpable thing. This last week I was visiting my parents in the house and village I grew up. Just in conversation with people I met there I realised that our family association with that place now stretches over half-a-century; that my memories of living there are now better counted in decades rather than years; and even my young children speak of the years they have been visiting there.

Time is, of course, something we all focus on more that we realise. Who here is still adjusting the time on clocks and forgotten watches after the clocks changed last week? Who of us, as the schools return tomorrow, will be focusing on the time needed to get organised an out of the door in the morning? Which of us is secretly counting down the shopping days till Christmas? We live lives and, in a world, where time, well at least one sense of time, dominates everything. An understanding of life and the world where value is measured in time and motion studies, where time is money and our lives are calibrated to the minute and even second.

But does it have to be this way?

Many of you will know that in the Bible, and particularly in the teaching of Jesus, time comes to us in two distinct senses. The first is chronos-time. This is the type of time I have been speaking about so far. This is clock-time. In the New Testament, when the Magi determined the time when the star in Bethlehem appeared they were speaking of chronos-time. When Jesus spoke with certainty of the time he has left with his disciples, he is speaking of a clock-time we would recognise.

There is a second, richer sense of time known as kairos-time. Unlike chronos-time this is now about the measuring and calibrating of time. Kairos-time is about the quality of the time we have. This is the time of the right season, the fullness of time. When, at the beginning of his ministry, Jesus declares:

The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.

Jesus is not saying that that is a promise or time to set our watches by, or mark in our diaries. He is saying that the kairos-time is fulfilled, that this is kingdom time.

On this All-Saints’ Sunday, and as we enter this season or remembering, we are called to be in kairos time. As we remember the saints today, give thanks for the faithful departed at our All Souls’ Service tomorrow, and remember those who have died in time of war next weekend, we are not setting them against the time-lines of our lives, rather we are being drawn into their time beyond time.

As I have heard it explained elsewhere, if our chronos-time is a like a string stretched along a table, then kairos-time “loops around, crosses, and intersects at unexpected junctures.” kairos-time is, as the writer Madeleine L’Engle has written “that time which breaks through chronos with a shock of joy”.


When Jesus went up the mountain and began to teach the crowd that sat at his feet this was the kingdom promise he was making in the great Beatitudes we have just heard in our gospel reading. In these timeless words Jesus was giving them a vision of that joy, that blessing, that will come to them, burst into the tick-tock of their lives.

Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

As we use this richer sense of time to frame what the church has come to know, in these weeks between All Saints’ Day and Advent Sunday, as Kingdom Season, we can also use this wisdom, I think, to re-frame one of the most pressing debates of our time.

In the coming weeks Parliament will debate a bill to legalise assisted dying for the terminally ill. I am no expert in the details of this debate, but I am concerned by the way in which aspects of this debate can and are being framed. As Lord Falconer, one of the strongest advocates for a change in the law has said:

the last few weeks and the last few months [of someone’s life] are a period where there is plainly nothing but an imminent death – the person retreats more and more. And all that they’ve got to look forward to is more indignity, more pain, more struggle.

There is in this view a deep sense of compassion and care for those who are dying. But it is also a view which, for me, is measured through chronos-time. But as we have seen in our reading today, as many of us will know in our own lives, there is a richness to the time we are given beyond the hours and minutes we might live.

One of the great privileges of ordained ministry is being able to spend time with those who know that their lives are coming to a close. In many of those cases there is, naturally, a desire not to waste the chronos-time they have left. So, whilst they are able they will use the time well and to get things in order. But there is also a palpable sense of the richness and uniqueness of that time. That when the right and fitting end of life and palliative care is in place there is a sense of joy and blessing in the gift of that time. 

I remember a woman in her fifties in my last parish who died of motor-neurone disease. Through the sacrifice and care of family and friends she was able to receive first rate palliative care, and when I asked if she would want to choose the time of her own end, she said didn’t. All she wanted was to be able to open her eyes and see her family. She wouldn’t have used these words, but what she treasured was the gift of that kairos-time.

For me we can find in this debate, in sharp-relief, a challenge which exists in all our lives. That in the pressures of our modern world, in our lives dominated by the utilitarian cost benefit analysis our time, all our time, can so easily become yet another commodity for us weigh and balance and barter. 

But as we sit in this season, surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses; as we still ourselves from the busyness of our lives and pressures that rain in on us from every angle, we need more now than ever to treasure the time we have. To cherish that time where the poor, the hungry, the merciful, the persecuted are given the time to know that they are blessed in the sight of God. To understand in our hearts that time is not primarily thing of utility, but chiefly a gift of grace. To know that our time is not just precious, it is sacred.

Because it is by knowing this deep truth that we can see the rich blessings and true joys of the kingdom-time which all the saints now enjoy.



Thursday, 17 October 2024

The wisdom of the Chapter House: a sermon preached at Choral Matins for the beginning of the legal year in Carlisle Cathedral on Thursday 17 October 2024.

Matthew 18: 1-5

Churches founded in the tradition of western monasticism, of which this Cathedral is one, were always defined by two spaces. The first, and most obvious, was the Oratory – the place of prayer and worship – in which we now sit. This was a place of clear and structured hierarchy. The members of the monastic foundation, with the Abbot at their head, would be ordered and seated in seniority. Beginning with the Abbot or Bishop all would know their place within a “great chain of being” with God at the top, then flowing through the officers of the monastery, through to the lowly novices, and beyond into the wider mass of people worship out of sight in the Nave of the church.

As we gather and worship in this oratory today, we can still see the echoes of the ordering of this monastic space. Not only in the ascriptions to the ancient stalls in which some of us are sitting, but also in the order through which we entered and will leave this service. An ordering which is finely calibrated to hold in tension the differing authorities of the Church, the state and the judiciary in this service of celebration.

The second space is dramatically and radically different. This is the space of the Chapter House. The Chapter House was traditionally a circular room, usually off the cloister on the south side of a monastery. Although the Chapter House here in Carlisle has been lost through this Cathedral's long and often violent history, we can still find fine examples of these spaces in, amongst other places, York and Lincoln. 

Where the Oratory was a space of carefully managed order, the Chapter House was a space of equality and candour. In this space all the members of the monastic community, from the eminent Abbot to the lowliest monk, would sit in a circle as they discussed the life of that community. This was a space designed deliberately so that the mightiest might hear and recognise the wisdom of the lowliest. As St Benedict, the father of western monasticism, said in his rule:

The reason why we said all should be called for counsel is that the Lord often reveals what is better to the youngest.

Benedict’s great wisdom was that if these monastic communities were to live out God’s call to them, then they needed to live with the inherent tension of these two spaces. Between the ordering of experience and authority of the Oratory and the Chapter House where they could hear and recognise the youngest and most insignificant member of their community with the same clarity and the oldest and seemingly wisest.

In Benedict’s vision the community lived out its call not only in the highly ordered structures of prayer and worship, but also the patterns of community life where, as Jesus tells us in our reading today:

Whoever becomes humble like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me.

This small digression into the history of western monasticism might seem a strange place to start as in this service to mark the beginning of the legal year. However, the instinct and wisdom revealed in our reading, and lived out in Benedict’s rule, motivates many of us who gather here today. As I have had chance to speak to Chris during his shrieval year it is clear what a premium he has placed on visiting and celebrating those organisations within our community which seek to put those who are so often overlooked and ignored in our society at the heart of everything they do. 

Whether that is in the work of Youth Zone here in Carlisle, which Chris chaired for many years, or the groups he has championed and visited through this year, or those organisations represented here today, the one defining factor within them all is the transformative good which comes when, as Jesus reminds us, we allow ourselves to be changed by our encounter with the youngest in our society. 

For some of us this call and challenge is motivated but a sense of faith and calling. For others this will come from a faint echo of this within our shared culture. For others still we do this because we simply see this to be right things to do. 

Whatever the motivation we all can recognise the needs of society, and lives of children and young people in our communities are dramatically transformed when we seek to recognise and meet their needs. For instance a recent government report has shown what many of you already know intuitively. That a young life supported can be a whole life transformed. In the case of this report, it shows that early intervention in the lives of young people drawn into a life of crime reduces, by a factor of 3 or 4, the chances of reoffending and with that the vicious and life-long cycle that that creates.

The call which we hear in our reading today is not an easy one. As a representative of the church I can see that challenge played out in aspects of our Cathedral life on display here today. On one hand we are rightly proud of the way in which – through our choirs – the voices and skills of children are championed as much as adults. But at the same time we also, in the south-east corner of this Cathedral have our Safeguarding Season prayer space. Part of a time we are holding here where we might offer to God the ways in which we have failed those we have been called to protect.

This is not a challenge limited to the life of the church. As we find again and again, none of our public institutions are immune from the temptations, where of personal privilege and institutional power have too often trumped our call to stand with and for the least. 

So what we might do?

Well one things is to ask ourselves, as we leave this Cathedral today and return to our place of work and speak with colleagues, members of senior teams or directors, and ask simply "where does our place of work sit on a scale between the Oratory and the Chapter House?" Are the physical and emotional spaces within which we work structured merely around experience and hierarchy alone or are they leavened by the voice and wisdom of the youngest in our midst? Do the public spaces and institutions of our common life – whether they are courts of law, or hospitals, or churches, or schools and beyond – not only build on the experience and wisdom gathered in this space, but also provide and champion that space and place where we not only notice, but allow ourselves to be transformed by, the wisdom and needs and voices of the youngest and most overlooked in our society.

Because we know that if we do this, we will stand with those too often ignored in our society and be transformed ourselves so that we might encounter again the one who came to serve, not to be served and through that glimpse a vision of the kingdom of heaven.

And Jesus said:

Whoever becomes humble like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me.

Amen.


Monday, 1 April 2024

"Moist with one drop of thy blood, my dry soul" - Triduum meditations, Carlisle Cathedral 2024

These meditations, focusing on the poems of John Donne, were delivered at Carlisle Cathedral during Holy Week 2024.



Maundy Thursday

How good a guest are you? By this I don’t mean do you strip the bed after you stay at a friend’s house or take your shoes off at the door. What I mean is how good are you, are we, at allowing ourselves just to be guests. How willing are we to be looked after, to receive the generosity of others, given not because we have asked for it, or because we deserve it, but this is the gift that host wishes to give to us.

Being a guest can be a strange thing. Perhaps because we live in such a transactional society, we often see the role of the guest as somehow part of a contract. We need to bring something, do something to help, earn our keep, sing for our supper. There is nothing wrong with this. Many a good host is glad of some extra help or a bottle or two to add to the collection. But sometimes the role of the guest is simply to be that. To be the guest. To rest in the generosity of the host without question or query.

If we track back a few centuries we find that there was not this same awkwardness in the relationship between the host and guest. Far from it. Early modern England, for instance, was shot through with the complex etiquette between host and guest. Most of this is lost to us now, but we do still find its imprint in the art and poetry of that time.

For instance, George Herbert’s greatest poem, Love III, is built around the structures and etiquette of the courtly dance which was the relationship between the host and the guest. That poem, if you know it, placing that between the author – as the unworthy guest – and “Love” as the generous host. The resolution coming when the guest accepts that their call is simply to be the guest and receive the gift that Love bestows on them for no other reason than that is what Love does.

Herbert’s biographers have pointed out that he would have learned this etiquette from his mother, the remarkable Magdalen Herbert, known and famed as one of the greatest hosts of the London society of her day. One of her most favoured guests was that other great religious poet of the seventeenth-century, John Donne. Through these coming days we will be using some of Donne’s poetry to punctuate and enrich the journey we will take together as guests of that greatest of hosts.

As we embark on that journey, I thought a good place to start would be with Donne’s own reflection on what it was to be a guest – a thought that he explores in a simple poem he wrote to Magdalen Herbert. It is, itself, not a great poem. One commentator has suggested it is in places “laboured, if a labour of love”. 

It is also, on this Maundy Thursday evening, perhaps a strange poem to begin with because its focus – Herbert’s namesake and for Donne her archetype – is Mary Magdalene. Mary Magdalene who is so crucial to the story of Good Friday and beyond is absent by name from the story that we heard in our Gospel reading this evening. Added to this is the theological calumny of Donne’s poem where he brings together – contrary to modern scholarship and, by his own admission, the wisdom of the Church Fathers – into his “Magdalene” three different women from the Gospels. First Mary Magdalene, who stood waited at the foot of the cross. Then second Mary of Bethany, who played host to Jesus with her sister Martha. And third the unnamed woman who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears, drying them with her hair.

However, with this poetic and theological licence understood, Donne’s words of praise provide a reflection on the relationship between the host and guest which not only patterned Magdalene Herbert’s remarkable life, but which can inform how we might begin this journey that lies ahead of us. 

What Donne stresses again and again through this short poem is the openness of the faith of this amalgamated “Magdalo” to Christ in all things. First as host – reflecting on the story of Jesus staying with Mary and Martha at Bethany – Donne speaks of the need to have the willingness to “harbour Christ Himself, a guest”. For this reason alone Donne feels Magdalene Herbert is a worthy successor to her names sake as host:

Increase their number, Lady, and their fame ;
    To their devotion add your innocence ;
Take so much of th' example as of the name,

But here Donne turns the call of the host on its head. The call, the openness, to act as host to Christ himself makes us in turn the guest of that greater host. That the generosity of the host becomes, in itself, an act of devotion which he saw both in these biblical archetypes, but also in Magdalene Herbert’s life.

That they did harbour Christ Himself, a guest,
    Harbour these hymns, to His dear Name address'd.

As we begin our journey through these coming days these patterns of courtly etiquette and manners might seem a strange place to begin. However, in their exploration of the relationship of the host and guest they offer a pattern for how we might respond to the invitation of these coming days. 

The question we might ask ourselves is the one I began with: how good a guest are we? Will we bridle in discomfort as we find our host take the role of a slave and wash our feet? Will we overdo it like Peter – and misunderstand the gift and action of our host and want to do more? Or will we receive that gift and, like Mary at Bethany, turn from the role of host to guest and simply sit and rest at the feet of our greater host. Will we – like Mary Magdalene – follow silently where our host leads us on this journey – from the upper room, to the foot of cross, and to a silent garden before dawn.

Will we have courage to put aside our pride, our self-importance, and allow ourselves to be the guest of our gracious host. A guest, as Donne says of Mary Magdalene, who was so open to the call of the host, that she was first to see and know the great truth of this journey we are to take. Mary Magdalene, whose:

        active faith so highly did advance,
    That she once knew, more than the Church did know,
The Resurrection;

And so as we begin this journey we might want to reflect on this relationship of host and guest. Not only as we gather at this table this night as we hear the call of our loving host and choose whether we, like Donne’s Magdalene, will ask how good a guest we can be.


Good Friday

John Donne is undoubtedly one of the great poets and prose stylists of the English language. In his own lifetime he was fated for his wit and linguistic ingenuity. In death not only were his publications instant best sellers, but there were countless cheap knock-offs by “J.D.” or “Dr Dunn” seeking to profit from his reflected glory.

Despite this undoubted brilliance there remains, for some, questions about the sincerity of his faith. Unlike his more earnest near contemporary George Herbert, Donne did not reject some more earthly themes explored in love poetry. Far from it. Some of his most brilliant and inventive poetry is his love poetry. Those who know his musing of the liberty and life of the humble flea would, I am sure agree. By this line of argument Donne was a brilliant man who fell into the life of the Church – and the prestigious role of Dean of St Pauls – more as an act of expediency rather than pious calling. It was, some have argued, through the Church that Donne – the “charmed” and “strong accomplished flatter” – found the wealth and standing in court and society that he had sought through his life. Ordination at the age of 43 was a last role of the dice after a failed life as an aristocratic secretary, MP, and diplomat.

The problem is with this line of argument is that those who use it clearly haven’t spent time with Donne’s poetry and his poetry focusing on Good Friday in particular. One of his finest and most ingenious poems is Upon the Annunciation and Passion falling on one day. In this Donne uses the calendrical coincidence in 1608 when Good Friday fell on the 25th March which, being nine-months before Christmas, is also the Feast of the Annunciation. Here he uses this temporal coincidence to reflect deeply on the physicality of the incarnation in conception and death.

This Church, by letting these days join, hath shown
Death and conception in mankind is one:
Or ‘twas in him the same humility,
That he would be a man, and leave to be:
Or as creation he had made, as God,

It is though another of his great religious poems, The Cross, which I would like to spend some time with today. In one sense this poem, although a deep and penetrating reflection on the cross, is not a Good Friday poem as such. Whether we think of Donne’s faith as sincere or not, he certainly followed the religious orthodoxy of the day. Living and ministering in the Church of the early seventeenth-century Donne stood with a religious establishment which was increasingly being assailed and attacked by more extreme Puritan elements in the church.

The Cross was written in 1604, a full ten years before his ordination. Its focus is the Puritan attacks on the use of crucifixes in Church and the signing of the cross at Baptism. Two particular practices of the Church of England which the more extreme Puritans saw as rank popery. Against this iconoclasm Donne offers a rich subtle reflection on how the cross binds us to Jesus who revealed his true self in and through the Cross.

Since Christ embraced the cross itself, dare I
His image, th’ image of His cross, deny?

So powerful is the cross, Donne argues, that is echoes through creation. It patterns the shape of our bodies, the pattern of our leisure, the form of the natural world, and even the shape of the heavens.

To stretch mine arms, and mine own cross to be ?
Swim, and at every stroke thou art thy cross ;
The mast and yard make one, where seas do toss ;
Look down, thou spiest out crosses in small things ;
Look up, thou seest birds raised on crossed wings ;
All the globe’s frame, and spheres, is nothing else
But the meridians crossing parallels.

What is the point, Donne points out to his Puritan adversaries, of removing crosses from our churches or liturgical practice when, if we have eyes, the cross is everywhere. This argument is, though, not simply a dig at some Puritan high-mindedness and do-goodery. These physical real world crosses point us to a deeper truth. That the cross is imprinted on every part of our lives.

Material crosses then, good physic be,
But yet spiritual have chief dignity.
[…]
For when that cross ungrudged unto you sticks,
Then are you to yourself a crucifix.

If we have the courage to look closely enough we find that the cross, the great sign of the shame of this great and terrible day, is imprinted on all of our lives. As we come to recognise the deep and indelible pattern of the cross we  begin to open to the presence of the cross in all things, and most deeply in ourselves. As we reflect more and more on the cross we are forced to open ourselves to the shame and cruelty of the cross. This sign of imperial cruelty and vengeance exists in one realm as a sign of the sinfulness and pride which we all carry within ourselves. 

pride, issued from humility,
For ‘tis no child, but monster ; therefore cross
Your joy in crosses, else, ‘tis double loss.

Far from hiding from the sign of the cross or removing it from our sight – as Donne believes the Puritans want – we need to be challenged and overshadowed by the cross. Because it is only then that we can truly recognise how we are woven into the fabric of a world where the cross was and remains a real and visceral reality. It is only in the stark reality of the cross that we can accept our place in the plain reality of this day. A reality summed up in the words of Donne’s contemporary, the Silesian Lutheran pastor Johann Heerman.

Who was the guilty? Who brought this upon thee?
Alas, my treason, Jesus, hath undone thee!
‘Twas I, Lord Jesus, I it was denied thee;
I crucified thee.

But for Donne it does not stop there. When we open ourselves to the true and abiding of nature the cross a new reality opens itself for us, because in the cross we find not only the shadow of our fallenness but also the reflection of God’s love.

Let crosses, so, take what hid Christ in thee,
And be His image, or not His, but He.

What Donne helps us see is this doubleness in the cross. That in this thing, this symbol which captures all the venality and cruelty of humanity this sign of our weakness and shame, this emblem of all that has brought us to this day is reflected back on us nothing else than the imprint of God’s love. Paradoxically it is only in spending time with the cross, in all its plain and unvarnished reality that we find the way to the truth that lies beyond it. That, to paraphrase St Paul, all our human wisdom draws us away from the cross, where God’s wisdom takes us straight to it. 

We live in a world where we flee from those things of the cross around us. We swipe past the hard stories we see on our phones. We turn our heads from the brokenness and cruelty of the world of which we are part. We each, in our own way, are heirs of those well meaning contemporaries of the Donne who would have us put away our crosses, who were themselves heirs of those who fled from that original cross and the place of the skull.

But today we are called to come to the cross. To look upon it and all the cost and pain it speaks of and, as Donne teaches us, put aside our own squeamishness and wisdom and:

Be covetous of crosses; let none fall ;
Cross no man else, but cross thyself in all.
Then doth the cross of Christ work faithfully
Within our hearts, when we love harmlessly
That cross’s pictures much, and with more care
That cross’s children, which our crosses are.


Easter Day

I do not think that I alone in finding it hard to find the words for this greatest of all days. The inhumanity of Good Friday has enough tragic resonances into our own world that we can find words aplenty. Similarly, the love and companionship of Maundy Thursday provides a pattern for our lives and language which one hopes we can communicate. But the sheer strangeness, the bewilderment, the super-mysterious nature of this day means that we cannot be faulted for being, at times, lost for words.

That is why I have often found it helpful to be guided through these days by words of a greater wordsmith. In our case the words and poetry of John Donne who died on this day, the 31st March, 1631. This though is not for the feint hearted. Donne’s language is dense and beguiling. It is as if through his words he is weaving complex tapestries which we are drawn deeper into the longer and more intently we examine them. In his poetry we find this brilliance not only their language but in their form and construction. No where is this more clearly seen than in the sequence of poems entitled La Corona.

La Corona was probably written in 1607 and is thought by many to be the poems which Donne sent to Magdalene Herbert prefacing them with his poem in praise of her which we reflected on on Maundy Thursday. The subject of these seven sonnets is the birth, life, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus. Together they form a cycle following the renaissance form of a “Crown” or Corona of sonnets where the sonnets are linked by repeating the final line of one sonnet as its first line of the next. The circle is then completed with the final line of the last sonnet matching the first line of the first sonnet. So Donne’s Corona begins and ends:

Deign at my hands this crown of prayer and praise.

There is, in Donne’s use of this ingenious form, all the brilliance we come to expect from him. But beyond that we can use these repeated lines to link and unlock the deep resonance and meaning of these days, particularly as we examine this pivot between the fifth and sixth sonnets – Crucifying and Resurrection – which turn on the line:

Moist with one drop of thy blood, my dry soul

As that line reflects back into the Good Friday sonnet it takes the form of a plea on behalf of the author. Returning to the themes found in Donne’s poem The Cross we find again that sense of deep personal culpability in the unvarnished truth and horror of the cross. In this place we discover that we were the ones who rejected Jesus, who retreated from him, who left him alone to carry his cross alone.

Lo ! where condemned He 
Bears His own cross, with pain, yet by and by 
When it bears him, He must bear more and die.

As the true cost and terror of the cross is made manifest on Good Friday all the author can do, all we can do, is plead for one drop of God’s love to remain with us in our dejection and failure.

Now Thou art lifted up, draw me to Thee, 
And at Thy death giving such liberal dole, 
Moist with one drop of Thy blood my dry soul.

It is with that baleful plea that Donne turns us from the desolation of Good Friday to the wonder and joy of today. Drawing from an image found in a hymn of Thomas Aquinas, Donne presents us with the transforming truth that in one drop of Christ’s blood is enough grace to wipe away the sinfulness and brokenness of the whole world. So his Resurrection sonnet begins:

Moist with one drop of Thy blood, my dry soul
Shall—though she now be in extreme degree 
Too stony hard, and yet too fleshly—be 
Freed by that drop, from being starved, hard or foul, 
And life by this death abled shall control 
Death, whom Thy death slew

This focus on this one small thing – one drop of blood – speaks again of the effervescence and brilliance of Donne’s own life and faith. Katherine Rundell, whose wonderful biography of Donne Super-Infinite I would recommend to anyone, captures this theme when she says:

[Donne] loved to coin formulations with the super- prefix: super-edifications, super-exaltations, super-dying, super-universal, super-miraculous. It was part of his bid to invent a language that would reach beyond language, because infinite wasn’t enough; both in heaven, but also here on earth, Donne wanted to know something larger than infinity.

With that in mind it is striking that as Donne reflects on the deep strangeness of the resurrection he does not, on this occasion, reach for these formulations. It is as if even that language is not enough. Rather in the simplicity of that “one drop” we are, paradoxically by Donne, being pointed to something “super-infinite”. That in that “one drop” there is something beyond our words and understanding can capture about the super-abundance of God’s love and grace for humanity.

That “one drop” carrying in it all the grace and forgiveness and love and transformation of the resurrection that our words could never and can never fully contain. It is as if Donne, in that “one drop” is pointing us to that beguiling conclusion to the Gospel of John where we are reminded of, in Donne’s terms, the super-infinity, of the things that Jesus did: 

that if every one of them were written down

the Evangelists tells us, 

I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

Or, as Donne said himself in the sermon he preached at the funeral of Magdalene Herbert – with whom we started this journey – that in the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, where death is dead and love has conquered, the doors of heaven are flung open and each one of us is welcomed to follow and discover the promise of God’s love: 

in these new heavens and new earth, for ever and ever and ever, and infinite and super infinite forevers.

Amen.




Sunday, 7 January 2024

"Enough for him": a sermon for the Feast of the Baptism of Christ

There is always a strange pleasure in discovering something unexpected and new in the deeply familiar. This happened to me over these weeks of Christmas. Inspired by a Christmas book, which tells the story of the formation of some of most well-known Christmas carols, I found myself listening with newly attuned ears to the words which were seemingly so familiar to me. In particular to the words of In the bleak midwinter.


Often listed in public votes as the nation's favourite Christmas carol, Christina Rossetti’s beautifully simple carol, which she entitled A Christmas Carol, is a masterpiece of simple elegance and meaning. The author of my carolling guidebook says of it:

It stands as a perfect example of her almost uncanny ability to distil complex thoughts and emotions into a language of almost childlike directness.

We can all look at those words and been drawn in by the simple imagery which captures the impossible majesty of the Christmas season. Like all great poetry we have our breath taken away by the final line’s injunction for the simple gift of our heart. But for me the word which has captured my imagination for the first time in the thousands of times listening and singing these famous words is the simple word which frames the third verse: "Enough". Here is that verse in full.

Enough for him, whom Cherubim
Worship night and day,
A breastful of milk,
And a mangerful of hay:
Enough for him, whom angels
Fall down before,
The ox and ass and camel
Which adore.

Here this one word captures much of the mystery and depth of the doctrine of the incarnation. That the God who, as we heard in our reading from the opening of Genesis, made the heavens and the earth, was content with the enough of his mother’s milk and a simple bed. That the creator of all things. as St Paul says elsewhere:

emptied himself,
   taking the form of a slave,
   being born in human likeness.
And being found in human form,
   he humbled himself
   and became obedient to the point of death—
   even death on a cross.

The God we know in Jesus is a God who comes to us, who communicates his grace to us, in those things which are enough for him. This profound truth is not simply limited to our sentimental images of the Christmas story.

Today’s feast – the Feast of the Baptism of Christ – carries within it that theme of humility, the sense of “enough-ness” which characterises the deep meaning of the incarnation. As we heard in our Gospel reading, Jesus inaugurates his public ministry not with the Judean equivalent of the showy declarations of power which will accompany the political campaigning of this coming year. No. Jesus begins his public ministry alongside the multitudes from Judea and Jerusalem seeking out John the Baptist and his baptism of repentance. It is in this place, alongside people seeking to remake and reform their ordinary lives, that Jesus is baptised and the truth of the incarnation is heard in the voice from heaven. In this place of “enough” we discover who Jesus truly is:

You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.

As we continue through this season we will hear how God reveals Gods-self to us in Jesus in the ordinary things of life: in a celebration of life and marriage at the wedding at Cana; in the religious patterns and ceremonies of his time as Jesus is proclaimed as the Light of the World by Simeon and Anna; and today in the gift and cleansing power of that most simple and elemental thing, in water.

This season of Epiphany, this season of revelation and manifestation, frames who God is for us in Jesus. Developing the poetic frame of Rosetti’s words: we will be shown that for Jesus five loaves and two fish were enough for him to feed thousands; that sharing a table with prostitutes and tax collectors was enough for him to open a vision of the kingdom of heaven, and that the public humiliation of a slave’s death was enough for him to show the breadth and length and the depth and the height of God’s love. As we come to the end of the opulence and generosity of the Christmas season the idea of “enough” is one which should not only frame our understanding of who God is for us in Jesus, but also challenge how we relate to the world created by that same God who saw that it was good.

Another book I have been reading over the last few weeks is called How much is enough? Money and the Good Life by the father/son partnership of economic historian Robert and philosopher Edward Skidelsky. In it they argue that one of the main problems for us, particularly living in the developed world, is that we have lost sight of a true sense of enough. Too much of our life is built not on “enough” but on “more”. Now the authors do acknowledge that there is nothing intrinsically wrong with “more”.  The economic development encouraged by a sense of “more” has brought about huge benefits in many people’s material conditions. But this is a two-edged sword exalting with it, particularly in its modern form “some of the most reviled human characteristics, such as greed, envy and avarice.”

The constant desire for “more”, they argue, has not made us happier. Far from it. Rather the constant searching for “more” has made our modern societies unable to recognise what can make for the balance of work and leisure which characterises, in the authors mind, a truly good life. More than this the corrosive power of “more” has deeper and lasting effects. Growth for its own sake, they argue, “is not only failing to make us happier, it is also environmentally disastrous”.

Through their book the authors make a series of practical suggestions for how we could reorder our lives and world around the principle of “enough” and not simple “more”. Particularly for those of us who live comfortable lives it asks “how might a society which already has 'enough' think about the organisation of its collective life”.

We have, in a short time, travelled a long distance from my Christmas musings on a favourite carol to the structures and building blocks of modern society. But what ties this all together is a sense that unless we can capture the liberating power of “enough” we are in danger of being pulled into the siren calls of “more” with all the corrosive and destructive tendencies that brings. Tantalisingly as they conclude their book the Skidelskys’ ponder whether it is possible to pursue a vision of the common good build on a real and practical sense of “enough” without a religious impulse to stir and inspire us.

In this Epiphany season, in this time of revelation and manifestation, we find that God in Jesus presents us God’s transforming promise through those small things, those simple things which were enough for him. As we emerge blinking from the warmth of Christmas into the light and reality of the new year, particularly as we look ahead to the choices that we will be called to make not least in a General Election, we might be wise to remember again the deep wisdom and power of that simple word “enough”. 

Not simply as a way of discovering again the deep and transforming truth of who God is for us in Jesus. But also how, transformed by that truth, we might change our lives and transform our world if we had the courage to turn away from the siren calls of “more” and live and work and rejoice, as Jesus did, with those things which were enough for him. 




Sunday, 3 December 2023

Absence and Presence - a sermon for Advent Sunday

Advent is the great season of absence. All the great poetry and hymnody of Advent speaks and yearns of this absence.

“O Come, O Come, Emmanuel”

“Come thou long expected Jesus”

“Lo he comes, with clouds descending”

All our attention is pointed towards a coming presence which, by its very nature, speaks of the absence that we experience at the heart of Advent. 

For many of us that absence has become something of a battle of wills against the oncoming presence of the Christmas season. As the march to Christmas begins earlier and earlier the desire of many to hold back that tide, to hold the place of absence that Advent speaks of, becomes stronger. Some of us, well I can only speak for myself, can place a perverse pride in holding off eating a mince pie, sipping a mulled wine, or putting up anything that smacks of a decoration, for as long as possible. In this modern Advent ritual, the absence of Advent and the presence of Christmas play a tug-of-war with only one true winner.


This playful pattern of absence and presence however only scratches the surface of the great spiritual and even existential truth that the absence at the heart of this season points us towards. Our readings today both speak of absence. From Isaiah we heard a prayer of longing echoed in the great Advent prose which opened this service. Here Isaiah yearns that God, despite the sinfulness of God’s people, will break into a reality seemingly devoid of God’s presence:

O that you would tear open the heavens and come down,
   so that the mountains would quake at your presence—
[…]
to make your name known to your adversaries,
   so that the nations might tremble at your presence!

In our Gospel reading Jesus, though present in the telling, describes the terrifying place of absence that will mark the time before his coming again. Where:

the sun will be darkened,
   and the moon will not give its light,
and the stars will be falling from heaven,
   and the powers in the heavens will be shaken.

These visions of the absence of Advent take us far beyond the abstemious habits that some of will seek to model in the coming days and weeks. This is a terrifying reality where God appears to be visibly and palpably absent. Another great Advent hymn, one which has though fallen from our hymn books, captures something of the existential fear of this truth.

“O quickly come, dread Judge of all;
for, awful though thine advent be,”

In Advent we are challenged to look deeply into the truth of our faith. That hard truth of our faith that however hard we might look for God’s presence we most often find ourselves in the place of a double absence spoken of in our readings today.  The first absence focuses on our present reality, where we seek the presence of God in a world where God appears to be absent, and where many remain indifferent to this reality. The second is an eschatological absence. One which looks to the end of this this present age, between the stories of the first coming and the promise of the second. A place where the Church stands longing for God’s presence in Jesus – known by the apostles and promised in the new Jerusalem – but recognisable only to us in the stories of the past, hope of the future, and the vivid absence of our present.

In these two experiences of absence there is a danger that absence and presence are placed in opposition to one another. If though we look to those stories of Jesus’ presence in the Gospels we find again and again that the great stories of God’s presence through Jesus lead to, or are defined by, an absence. Jesus’ baptism, that moment when he is revealed as God’s anointed, is followed by his withdrawal and absence into the wilderness. The truth of the resurrection is fulfilled not only by the presence of the risen Jesus, but the absence of the Cross and the empty tomb. The tangible experience of God’s Spirit in the gift and feast of Pentecost is promised by Jesus, but only once he absents himself and is taken into heaven at the Ascension.

Advent teaches us to seek and know this great paradox of our faith. That God, in Jesus, reveals God’s presence, very often through his absence. Knowing this these absences we experience now take a new form. They are no longer vacuums, but places where, if we have the courage to look, we can discover God’s presence. The Welsh priest poet RS Thomas, that great bard of paradox, speaks of the truth of presence in absence in his poem Via Negativa:

        God is that great absence
In our lives, the empty silence
Within, the place where we go
Seeking, not in hope to
Arrive or find.

As the poem goes on he seeks to take this challenging, but often abstract truth, and ground it in realities of our lives. Perhaps echoing Jesus’ vision of the absence of star-less sky, he speaks of God as “the darkness between the stars”. Then as footprints which God has left which we follow. Then with a physical and visceral truth he says:

        We put our hands in
His side hoping to find
It warm.

However, we do it, Advent calls us not to simply seek out these places of absence, but to attend to them, and in that attention discover God’s presence through them.

I had an extraordinary experience of this recently. A few weeks ago, I was able to take a few days away from the Cathedral for a time of personal retreat. For a few days I focused my reading, reflection, and prayer on the themes of Advent and particularly the theme of absence. On my final morning of retreat, I decided I would try to ground this reading by taking myself to a physical place of absence. So, I drove and then walked along Hadrian’s Wall to the gap in the Wall where, until recently, the great Sycamore Tree stood. 


As many of you will know, this was a place very familiar to me and my ministry and so there was both a familiarity and shock as I walked up the path, seeing the outline of a landscape which was both reassuringly familiar and deeply strange. In the middle of that familiar dip in the horizon stood a great gap, a great absence. Where the tree had stood there was now just a bare stump. And there with me other walkers and pilgrims stood in silence and looking deeply into that place of absence. But as we looked into that absence, and came closer to where the tree had stood, a small sign, placed there by the National Trust, came into view. It reads:

“This tree stump is still alive
If we leave it alone it might sprout new growth”

I very much doubt this simple sign was intended to articulate so well the deep paradox and truth of absence and presence that lies at the heart of this great season. But for me, in that moment, it spoke more deeply of this truth than all the hymns and poems and sermons I could find. Having gone to that place looking for the reality of absence I found unexpectedly and beautifully, a promise of presence echoing Isaiah’s great words of Advent hope and promise:

A shoot shall come out from the stock of Jesse,
   and a branch shall grow out of his roots.
The spirit of the Lord shall rest on him,
   the spirit of wisdom and understanding,
   the spirit of counsel and might,
   the spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord.
His delight shall be in the fear of the Lord.

The promise of Advent, not only for this season but also for our life of faith, is that in God’s seeming absence is always a presence breaking in. Our task and invitation through this season is to seek and attend to those places and spaces and times of absence that punctuate the realities of our everyday lives; to spend time with them; and speak into those places of seeming absence that great Advent prayer:

“Amen, Come Lord Jesus.”